No Irish, no blacks, no dogs, no unemployed

So if I needed any reassurance on Saturday that my most excellent birthday was over and that life was gonna revert to its usual shittiness, I got it in the form of two stories I read on Huffington.

The first one was no surprise: The number of people out of work six months or longer now makes up 46 percent of the total of unemployed Americans, and should reach half by summer’s end. So much for economic stimulus.

The second one was equal parts shocking, saddening, anxiety-raising and just plain enraging:

Now we’re hearing that some companies are refusing to even consider hiring unemployed workers.

What the fuck?!?


Until then, I thought nothing last week could be more outrageous than the insensitive asshole who runs BP whining “I’d like my life back.” (Yeah, so would the 11 guys who died on your unsafe, corner-cutting rig, their loved ones, the thousands of animals and plants that have perished so far, the thousands of fishermen who might have lost their livelihoods for good, the tourism industry, the region that might very well have lost its ecosystem forever … but all of that, of course, trifles compared to the perils of poor little Tony …)

But here it was, in black and white: Some companies refuse to even look at a resume from someone who’s unemployed.

Two electronics firms in Texas recently posted engineering positions on a jobs website with the same note at the end: “Client will not consider/review anyone NOT currently employed regardless of the reason.” And Sony Ericsson, hiring workers for a new plant in Georgia recently, included the line “NO UNEMPLOYED CANDIDATES WILL BE CONSIDERED AT ALL.”

And it’s not just high-tech jobs. I haven’t seen such wording yet in ads for my fields of interest (writing/editing/Web), but according to the HuffPost story, it even applied to a craigslist ad seeking assistant restaurant managers in Jersey. (Jersey!)

Did we step through the looking glass or something? We won’t give you a job because you don’t have a job? Did we all wake up one morning and take the brown acid?

So now we’ve entered another new, exquisite, twisted, Catch-22ish form of job discrimination. In a country where many women still tilt at glass ceilings, and discrimination against age, sexual identity and gender identity are still very anecdotal if not documentable, now we have to worry about job status, too?

Jesus. This economy is truly bringing out the worst in people. (Actually, it was the worst in people — namely, the wanton greedy who didn’t have enough millions already — who brought about the economy. Which has brought out even more of the worst in people.) If we haven’t been beaten up enough already by stories of companies shedding good, loyal and capable workers because they weren’t generating enough profit to satisfy the scumbags of Wall Street, or too-many-to-be-hearsay tales of experienced, highly skilled workers being passed over for younger and dumber kids willing to work for scraps … well, this, I think, we’ve finally hit a moral rock bottom.

The people who most need work are being denied work. Can anyone tell me where in a sane world this makes a shred of sense?

A spokesman for Benchmark Electronics of Angleton, Texas, one of the companies that posted the above-mentioned no-unemployed ads, confirmed his company’s policy to HuffPost’s Laura Bassett:

“We typically go after people that are happy where they are and then tell them about the opportunities here. We do get a lot of applications blindly from people who are currently unemployed — with the economy being what it is, we’ve had a lot of people contact us that don’t have the skill sets we want, so we try to minimize the amount of time we spent on that and try to rifle-shoot the folks we’re interested in.”

Number one: People usually change jobs because they’re NOT happy where they are, not because they ARE happy. Number two: Let’s reverse the order here. The real primary reason, which was PR-weasel-spun down to No. 2 — is that companies don’t want to deal with a zillion resumes from unqualified people. To a point, that’s understandable. And with an average of 5.5 people seeking each job, according to the most recent Labor Department stats, some of the more desperate of us will throw resumes everywhere, which can be a headache for any HR department.

So … the best solution is to throw everyone out with the bathwater? Deny ’em all; let God sort ’em out? Pass over a talented worker who could be a key to your future success simply because (s)he doesn’t have a job right now? Someone whose ideas and efforts could possibly spur your company’s growth and help shape an industry?

Yeah. Real smart. I’m sure they taught that in your MBA program.

The part that really hurts and pisses me off is the “regardless of the reason” part.

Excuse me, but this whole mess wasn’t our goddamn faults. We weren’t up in the boardrooms, making the shortsighted, shark-feeding decisions that led to the near-collapse of the economy. We didn’t put our companies in peril by our choices. But here we are, many of us out on the streets for something we didn’t create. And most of the people who’ve made these decisions still have their jobs and their Mercedes and their foreign vacations and their multimillion-dollar homes. (And their summer homes, too.) And now some of these corporate execs are the ones saying “We don’t want you” because we’ve been thrown out of jobs?


I’d like to think that there are still companies and leaders and other executives in the world with a shred of decency and a sliver of heart. People who are smart enough to know that there’s a whole fish-in-a-barrel pool of excellent talent out there just waiting to be plucked from the water. People whose efforts could really help jump-start the economy if they’re given the chance. I’d like to think that the companies mentioned in Huffington are still the exception rather than the rule.

I know in my lines of work, I still have a lot of qualities that make me desirable — even more than I was when I was still employed. My skills haven’t eroded; in fact they’ve improved. I still write most days (that’ll never go away), I edit, I’ve sharpened my blogging and social media skills, and I keep up closely with what’s going on in the world. And I still hold out hope that someone will see my skills and say “Hey, where’ve you been all my life?” and not “I’m sorry; we can’t consider you unless you have a job.”

I’m doing my damndest to stay optimistic. After all, I do have bites on two jobs at the moment, and unemployment doesn’t seem to be an obstacle to either one. But nothing is certain until it’s certain, and the only thing that’s certain right now is that it will be 15 months out of work this Friday and I don’t know how much more of this I can deal with. My unemployment and COBRA should be gone by summer’s end. I could be out on some street somewhere by year’s end.

And hearing stories like these two HuffPosts sure as hell doesn’t make me feel any better.


Tags: , , , , ,

7 Responses to “No Irish, no blacks, no dogs, no unemployed”

  1. Jeanne Leblanc Says:

    Wow, Fran, that is truly horrifying. But please don’t lose hope. As the economy slowly picks up, I have seen several friends who have endured long-term unemployment find jobs. Some companies have a sense of decency.

  2. jmucci Says:

    Fran, dammit…reading this infuriated me. I haven’t had a steady job in almost 3 years now. I never used to be out of work for more than a few days. Then it got to be a month….then the next time it would be 3 or 4 months…then up to 7 months at a time. And all I’m getting is short temp jobs, which at this point, I’m even grateful for those, since my unemployment checks went from about 370/week down to 98 dollars. Who can live on that? I’m back living with my folks (which, with the way things are going, thank God for that) but it doesn’t look like I’ll ever be able to get back out on my own, and it’s already been way too long that I’ve been with them. And it was never a desire of mine to have to return to shitty Waterbury. Anyhow, this just shows that life in America has really taken some bizarre, horrendous turn over the past 10 years. It makes you not even WANT to work (not that anybody ever really does) because you feel like they will fire you for any little reason, and they expect you to work like a dog for little pay, and be simply happy to even have something … anything at all. I no longer have much of a clue as to what they are even looking for in a worker. All the things you used to have to put on a resume or do or say in an interview are now considered the absolute wrong things, apparently. Then you look at the cream puff jobs CT state workers have…it’s disgraceful how much they get paid, basically to do nothing. When you add in overtime, benefits, 401K, etc, they are getting something like twice as much as what their actual salary is. And tons of time off. But you probably have to sleep with someone’s wife in order to get a job like that. Some days, I can’t even bring myself to look for a job, even though I know I should be. I almost feel like these are my “retirement years” (at 40 years old), and when I’m in my 70s I’ll still be working. Certainly won’t be able to afford to retire early, if ever. I never thought I’d look back on the 90’s as some magical time…but they certainly are. We didn’t realize how good we had it. And how completely everything would change for the worse in such short time. And by the way, reading that comment from that BP asshole…. uggghhh. What a typical corporate douchebag! It absolutely infuriates and sickens me what BP has caused, and how incompetently they are handling what is probably one of the worst things that has ever happened to the earth. And he’s whining like a little pussy, while still making his millions of dollars. And I’ve heard BP is going to give their stockholders millions & millions and they are spending millions to fix their image. What the fuck?!? Here’s an idea: why don’t you stop this leak & clean up the Gulf and reimburse all the people who are out of work now because of you…that might go a long way towards fixing your image. It’s like Toyota spending tens of millions on advertising to repair their image. Hey, why not just start making better, safer cars, you idiots?!? Okay, I’m through ranting now. Time to go back to applying for jobs I’ll never hear back from, because I’m unemployed.

  3. Jennifer Says:

    Fran, I saw this post on HuffPo as well and was AMAZED. For years America has given corporations the same basic rights as individuals but has not held them up to the same moral standards and this is what happened.

    More amazing to me is that after I posted this on my Facebook feed, I’ve had a couple of friends leave comments along the lines of “well, really, it’s the unemployed’s fault.” W.T.F.? I hope that these individuals continue to have the good luck they’re having ’cause they obviously have never been laid off or known anyone laid off. For far too many people unemployment wasn’t their choice, it was the choice (as you said) of others in power positions.

    I just can’t believe the state we seem to be in.

  4. Mike Nemeth Says:

    Interesting post. Weird trend. I wonder if such policies could backfire?

  5. Jackie Says:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: